aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/til/how-to-write-great-papers.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/til/how-to-write-great-papers.md')
-rw-r--r--content/til/how-to-write-great-papers.md55
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/til/how-to-write-great-papers.md b/content/til/how-to-write-great-papers.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6edd8f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/til/how-to-write-great-papers.md
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
++++
+title = "How to Write Great Papers"
+date = 2026-04-22T20:42:27+02:00
+draft = false
+categories = [ "TIL" ]
++++
+I watched a [video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WP-FkUaOcOM) that was recommended by my professor. It contained a lot of interesting tips.
+
+## Don't wait: Write
+It's better to follow:
+>Idea -> Write -> Research
+
+Instead of:
+>Idea -> Research -> Write
+
+Because by starting to write down immediately you can crystallize your idea. It forces you to be clear and focused.\
+Then it's easier to discuss it with other people because you have concrete material to reference.
+>*Writing papers is primary mechanism of **doing** research.*
+
+## Identify your key idea
+It's important understand what idea you want to convey. The goal of the paper is to *infect* the reader with this idea.\
+The paper should have just one, clear **idea**. If you have lots of ideas just write lots of papers.
+>*Do not be afraid on developing apparently trivial ideas, often it turns out that they are quite interesting.*
+
+>*Even the greatest ideas are **worthless** if you keep them by yourself.*
+
+## Tell a story
+You should capture the reader attention in the introduction, because most of the time the reader does not dive further if it's not engaged.\
+You should clearly state the problem and your solution in a way that keeps the reader interested in your idea.
+>*"This seems a though problem!" "I wish I knew how to solve that." "Mmh, the solution is very clever!"*
+
+It's better to do it by giving a simple example and not the general case.
+>*Act like you are trying to explain it on a whiteboard.*
+
+## Nail your contributions
+Clearly point out what your contributions are: they drive the entire paper. Do not leave you reader wondering what they are reading about.\
+They should be refutable (written in a form that can be verified), so very precise and not vague.\
+Then you provide evidence to support each claim.
+
+## Related work: later
+You should introduce your idea first because it should be the focus of the paper and the reader could get tired of reading other technical descriptions.\
+After explaining your contributions in detail you can expand on other approaches and, even better, make comparisons and point out the benefits and weakness of your idea.
+
+## Put your readers first
+Don't be overly technical as it might exaust your reader or make them feel stupid.\
+Try to instill an intuition first (using a simple example) then dive into the details. The other way around does not work.
+
+## Listen to your readers
+Ask as much people as possible to read your drafts.
+Give them specific instruction like:
+>"Read until you don't make sense of what is written then stop".
+
+This way you can point out where the paper is overcomplicated.
+
+>*Be truly grateful for criticism as well as prise.*