From dbdd3ea807232b0be83d6a0eba9eb13011eb48e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ericmarin Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 15:38:35 +0200 Subject: related work + conclusion --- chapters/background/03-satisfiability-modulo-theories.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'chapters/background/03-satisfiability-modulo-theories.tex') diff --git a/chapters/background/03-satisfiability-modulo-theories.tex b/chapters/background/03-satisfiability-modulo-theories.tex index bd90559..a55d54d 100644 --- a/chapters/background/03-satisfiability-modulo-theories.tex +++ b/chapters/background/03-satisfiability-modulo-theories.tex @@ -19,6 +19,6 @@ To represent a ReLU activation $y = \max(0, x)$ in LRA, we must introduce a disj (x > 0 \land y = x) \lor (x \le 0 \land y = 0) \end{equation} For a network with $N$ ReLU neurons, there are up to $2^N$ possible activation patterns. Solving the -verification property requires the SMT solver, such as Z3 presented by Demura et al.~\cite{demoura2008z3}, +verification property requires the SMT solver, such as Z3 presented by De Moura et al.~\cite{demoura2008z3}, to implicitly explore this branching search space. -- cgit v1.2.3